Queen’s income rises to £82m to cover cost of Buckingham Palace works

Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip at Ascot racecourse on 20 June 2017. Photograph: Charlie Crowhurst/Getty

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Queen’s income rises to £82m to cover cost of Buckingham Palace works” was written by Caroline Davies and Rupert Neate, for The Guardian on Monday 26th June 2017 23.01 UTC

The Queen is in line for a near-doubling of her income to more than £82m due to a government decision to increase her funding to cover “essential works” to Buckingham Palace.

The Crown Estate, which owns most of Regent Street and swaths of St James’s as well as thousands of acres of farmland, forests and coastline, made £328.8m profit in the year to the end of March 2017, an 8% increase on the previous year.

The Queen’s sovereign grant, the amount she receives from taxpayers, is calculated as a percentage of Crown Estate profits. In November, it was announced that the percentage would rise for 10 years from 15% to 25%.

The Queen’s share of the last year’s profits will amount to £82.2m – but she will have to wait until 2019, as her income from the estate is paid two years in arrears. Last year the Queen’s take was £42.8m, and in 2012 it was £29.1m.

The rise was agreed to fund the £370m refurbishment of Buckingham Palace, including replacing the ageing electrical and plumbing systems with their vulcanised India rubber cabling and ancient toilet cisterns. The public cost of the monarchy excludes those of security, which are not revealed.

Details of the increase were released as Buckingham Palace accounts revealed the royal family last year spent £4.5m on travel.

The most expensive journey was aboard the new government Voyager “state jet”, introduced by former prime minister David Cameron for official government and royal family use to save costs.

The accounts show it cost an estimated £154,000 for Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall to hire Voyager on charter for a week-long trip to Romania, Italy and Austria. One official said the bill had not yet been paid, and may yet be reduced as it was an estimate. Palace officials believe it “will prove to be value for money against the cost of commercial charters”.

The royal train, used only by the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh and Charles, proved to be mile for mile the most expensive form of travel. Prince Philip, who is retiring from official engagements at the end of the summer, ran up a bill of £18,690 by taking the royal train to Plymouth, Devon, to attend a dinner at the Royal Marines barracks.

A two-day train journey by Charles from Windsor to Lancashire, Cumbria and West Yorkshire cost £46,038. The train was used on 14 occasions last year, and costs between £800,000 and £900,000 a year. An official said it was good value for money and, “although not the cheapest way” was better in terms of safety, security and convenience for the elderly royals.

Prince Charles also spent £73,297 on a private charter to attend the funeral of Shimon Peres in Israel, and a further £72,756 on a charter for him and his wife to pay an official visit to Muscat, Abu Dhabi and Bahrain.

The air travel costs to send the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge on an official tour of India were £97,703 in charter and scheduled flights.

Officials said members of the royal family “quite frequently” travelled business rather than first class, but each journey was tailored to circumstance. “If you are expected to arrive and be greeted formally by a head of state and do all sort of engagements when you land, there is quite a strong argument to go in as comfortable a fashion as you can,” said one. The queen had the veto on expensive travel, and exercised it.

Of the cost, Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, said: “It accounts for 65p per person per annum in the UK; that’s the price of a first class stamp. When you consider that against what the Queen does and represents for this country, I believe it represents excellent value for money.”

The funding increase to cover improvements to Buckingham Palace was decided in a review by the Royal Trustees – the prime minister, the chancellor and Reid. Officials have said the repair work, which is set to take 10 years, is essential to avoid the risk of “catastrophic building failure”.

MPs voted 464 to 56 to approve the change. Two Labour MPs, Rushanara Ali and Dennis Skinner, and all SNP MPs were among those who voted against.

Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, published its own report on royal expenses and claimed, when security and other costs are included, the annual bill for the monarchy is nearer £345m.

Graham Smith, the organisation’s chief executive, said: “This massive bill for the taxpayer is supporting privileged lifestyles: helicopter flights around the country, palatial homes, round-the-clock security for minor royals who should pay their own way, and millions of pounds in cash handed to the family by the two duchies.”

 

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Related links

About Moniek 1105 Articles
My name is Moniek and I am from the Netherlands. I began this website in 2013 because I wanted to share these women's amazing stories.

1 Comment on Queen’s income rises to £82m to cover cost of Buckingham Palace works

  1. 65p is nothing compared to the wasted tax dollars stolen from us in the states, and we have nothing to show for it. At least you’re keeping history alive, whereas we are tearing ours down. It’s not an equal comparison by any means, but it would be similar to The Tower being torn down because a minority of people had hurt feelings over some of the bad things that happened there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Subscribe to our newsletter and join 2673 other subscribers!

%d bloggers like this: